Skip to main content

CML5619F Research Task: Journal articles

This guide is intended to assist those conducting the CML5619F Research Task.

Searching for journal articles

When searching for journal articles, first construct a search strategy using your topic, and the keywords therein, and different search operators.

HeinOnline

Westlaw

Google Scholar

Some suggested journal articles

Baffes, John. The “Cotton Problem”. The World Bank Observer 20 (1): 109-144. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/41261411

Anderson, Kym & Valenzuela, Ernesto. The softest subsidy: agricultural subsidy cuts, new biotechnologies, developing countries, and cotton. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs 9(1): 7-15. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43134162

Heinisch, Elinor Lynn. West Africa versus the United States on Cotton Subsidies: How, Why and What Next? The Journal of Modern African Studies 44(2): 251-274. URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3876157

Dakoure, Amanda Pamela. 2013. Cotton-4 and the Cotton Subsidies Issue: A litmus test for the WTO’s benefits to least-developed countries. Journal of World Investment &Trade 14(5): 852-888. Available: HeinOnline.

Buhi, Jason G. 2005. Serious Prejudice: The Decline and Fall of Agriculatural Subsidies after the World Trade Organization’s Upland Cotton Decision. Penn State International Law Review 24(2): 237-256. Available: HeinOnline.

Cross, Karen Halverson. 2006. King Cotton, Developing Countries and the Peace Clause: The WTO’s US Cotton Subsidies Decision. Journal of International Economic Law 9(1): 149-196. Available: https://doi.org/10.1093/jiel/jgi055

Gillon, William A. The Panel Report in the US-Brazil Cotton Dispute: WTO Subsidy Rules Confront US Agriculture. Drake Journal of Agricultural Law. 10(1): 7-56. Available: HeinOnline.

Powell, Stephen J. & Schmitz, Andrew. 2005. The Cotton and Sugar Subsidies Decisions: WTO’s Dispute Settlement System Rebalances the Agreement on Agriculture. Drake Journal of Agricultural Law 10(2): 287-330. Available: HeinOnline

Shumaker, Michael J. 2007. Tearing the Fabric of the World Trade Organisation: United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton. North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 32(3): 547-604. Available: HeinOnline

Oduwole, Jumoke. 2012. An Appraisal of Developing Country Coalition Strategy in the WTO Doha Round Agriculture Negotiations. Currents: International Trade Law Journal 20(2): 45-59. Available: HeinOnline

Kanade, Mihir. 2016. Chronicle of the Doha Wars: The Battle of Nairobi – Appraisal of the Tenth WTO Ministerial. Strathmore Law Journal 2: 155-164. Available: HeinOnline

Kennedy, Kevin C. 2008. The Doha Round Negotiations on Agricultural Subsidies. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy. 36(3-4): 335-348. Available: HeinOnline

Cho, Sungjoon. 2010. The Demise of Development in the Doha Round Negotiations. Texas International Law Journal 45(3): 573-602. Available: HeinOnline

Jobodwana, Z. Ntozintle. 2011. WTO African Cotton Wars: The intractable Agriculture Policy Reforms. US-China Law Review 8(2): 87-120. Available: HeinOnline

Olson, Luke. Incentivizing Access to the WTO’s Dispute System for the Lease-Developed Contries: Legal Flaws in Brazil’s Upland Cotton Decision. Minnesota Journal of International Law 23(1): 101-136. Available: HeinOnline

Kennedy, Kevin C. 2004/2005. The Incoherence of Agricultural, Trade and Development Policy for Sub-Sahara Africa: Sowing the Seeds for False Hope for Sub-Saharan Africa’s Cotton Farmers. Kansas Journal of Law & Public Policy 14(2): 307-388. Available: HeinOnline

Kuruk, Paul. 2013. The Subsidies Issue in International Trade: Musings of the Economic Partnership Agreement Negotiations. North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 38(3): 327-374. Available: HeinOnline

Yusuf, Guled. 2009. The marginalisation of African agricultural trade and development: a case study of the WTO’s efforts to cater to African agricultural trading interests particularly cotton and sugar. African Journal of International and Comparative Law. 17(2)-213-239. Available: Westlaw.

Grossman, Gene M. 2011.“Optimal” retaliation in the WTO – a commentary on the Upland Cotton arbitration. World Trade Review 10(1):133-164. Available: Westlaw

Mohan, Sushil. 2007. Reforming agricultural trade among developing countries. World Trade Review 6(3): 397-411. Available: Westlaw

George, Carol. 2003. Why Cancun was NOT such a great disaster. The Doha development agenda…continued. International Trade Law and Regulation 9(6):145-157. Available: Westlaw

Kurtz, Jurgen. 2004. Developing Countries and their engagement in the World Trade Organisation: An assessment of the Cancun ministerial. Melbourne Journal of International Law 5: 280. Available: Westlaw

Wilkinson, Rorden. 2008. Developing country participation in the GATT: a reassessment. World Trade Review 7(3): 473-510. Available: Westlaw

Eagleton-Pierce, Matthew. 2013. Symbolic power in the World Trade Organisation. World Trade Review 12(4): 743-745. Available: Westlaw

Sapir, Andre. 2008. Subsidisation, price suppression and expertise: causation and precision in Upland Cotton. World Trade Review 7(1): 183-209. Available: Westlaw

Efstathopoulus, Charalampos. 2012. Leadership in the WTO: Brazil, India and the Doha development agenda. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 25(2): 269-293. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2012.678294

Scott, James. 2010. Developing coutnries in the ITO and GATT negotiations. Journal of International Trade Law and Policy 9(1): 5-24. URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/14770021011029582